Re: Stored data missed in setup.S

From: Richard B. Johnson (root@chaos.analogic.com)
Date: Wed Apr 23 2003 - 09:36:55 EST


On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, Andrew Kirilenko wrote:

[SNIPPED...]

> OK. And now code looks like:
> -->
> start_of_setup: # line 160
> # bla bla bla - some checking code
> movb $1, %al
> movb %al, (0x100)
> ....
> ....
> cmpb $1, (0x100)
> je bail820 # and it DON'T jump here
> <--
>

> I'm sure, I'm doing something wrong. But what???

The only possibiity is that the code you just showed is not
being executed. Absolute location 0x100 is not being overwritten
by some timer-tick (normally) so whatever you write there should
remain. You just put a byte of 1 in that location and then
you compared against a byte of 1. If the CPU was broken, you
wouldn't have even loaded your code.

It is quite likely that the IP is being diverted around your code
by some previous code.

FYI, you can check the progress of your code by 'printing' on
the screen. Set up ES to point to the screen segment, and write
letters there:

        movw $0xb800, %ax
        movb %ax, %es
        movb $'A', %es:(0)

This 'prints' an 'A' at the first location on the screen.

Cheers,
Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.4.20 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips).
Why is the government concerned about the lunatic fringe? Think about it.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 22:00:36 EST