Re: [PATCH] Runtime memory barrier patching

From: Jamie Lokier (jamie@shareable.org)
Date: Mon Apr 21 2003 - 19:13:30 EST


Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Such as removing the lock prefix when running non-SMP?
>
> I think you should use a separate mechanism for that. It's really a
> separate issue, _and_ the replacement is actually quite different (and
> much more common, so you'd want to use a more compact data structure that
> is likely just the list of addresses of locked instructions).

Indeed.

-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 22:00:31 EST