Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Mon Apr 21 2003 - 06:52:29 EST


On Llu, 2003-04-21 at 12:19, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> I can very well accept that argument. What I am trying to do is only make
> _someone_ writing a fs listen to the problem, and maybe - only maybe - in _his_
> fs it is not as complicated and so he simply hacks it in. I am only arguing for
> having a choice. Not more. If e.g. reiserfs had the feature I could simply
> shoot all extX stuff and use my preferred fs all the time. That's just about

You can interest Hans Reiser I'm sure. Just find $100,000.

Its economically saner, better design and a lot more things to just use
md.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 22:00:29 EST