Re: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?

From: Chuck Ebbert (76306.1226@compuserve.com)
Date: Sun Apr 20 2003 - 12:44:34 EST


>> I have some ugly code that forces all reads from a mirror set to
>> a specific copy, set via a global sysctl. This lets you do things
>> like make a backup from disk 0, then verify against disk 1 and take
>> action if something is wrong.
>
> That's interesting. Have you thought of making it read from _both_
> disks and check that the data matches, before passing it back?

  It didn't seem to be worth doing, since a userspace program could
be written to do the same thing using my small patch. Only problem
is, it uses a global sysctl that affects every mirror set in the machine,
so it could affect performance of every mirror if used during load.

------
 Chuck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 22:00:27 EST