>>>>> Dave Jones (Dave) said:
Dave> On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 06:44:54AM +0200, Jurriaan wrote:
>> From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
>> Date: Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 10:10:53PM -0400
>> > Just booted into 2.5.67-BK-latest (plus my __builtin_memcpy patch).
>> > Everything seems to be running just fine, so naturally one must nitpick
>> > little things like being told my CPU is running at 0.000 Mhz. :)
>> >
>> fwiw, my Athlon XP2400 does the same in 2.5.67-ac1:
>>
>> processor : 0
>> vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
>> cpu family : 6
>> model : 8
>> model name : AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2400+
>> stepping : 1
>> cpu MHz : 0.000
>> cache size : 256 KB
>> bogomips : 1970.17
Dave> Curious. Do either of you have any cpufreq bits enabled?
Dave> If so, does it go away if you disable them?
Dave> That frobs with cpu_khz, so it *could* be not initialising
Dave> it someplace. Especially if your hardware turns out to be
Dave> unsupported by any of the cpufreq backend drivers..
It does not help me with 2.5.67-ac2 + pcmcia patch. I get 0.000 MHz,
589.82 BogoMIPS with or without CPUFreq. It did the same thing with
2.5.67-ac1 (did not test w/o CPUFreq).
The box is 600 MHz PIII (Coppermine) in Dell Inspiron 5000. On the plus
side I kind of like the # of insns per clock cycle ;-)
As Jeff said it's almost OK otherwise; it hangs on boot without the
pcmcia patch and I saw USB Storage oopses.
Petr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 22:00:25 EST