On Fri, 2003-04-18 at 17:24, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Well, actually, once glibc is updated to call SYS_mknod64 and have the
> right MAJOR() and MINOR() macros, it shouldn't require any changes to
> mknod(1).
Agreed. Assuming mknod(1) is dev_t-clean, this is obsolete as soon as
glibc is updated for 64-bit dev_t. Until then, this is available and
easy and works.
> What would probably be useful for mknod(1), if it doesn't already, is
> to allow the major/minor to be specified in any of the standard bases,
> i.e. using strtoul(...,...,0).
mknod(1) does not, I think. Actually, maybe it does... it uses some
coreutils wrapper.
But my mknod64(1) certainly does :)
Hex, decimal, and binary should all work.
Robert Love
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 22:00:25 EST