Yes, there are distributions and a lot of "end-users" around using devfs.
About 2.2.x: I think only putting #ifdef CONFIG_DEVFS_FS before defining the
'static devfs_handle_t devfs_handle' can fix the problem. Can you test that?
The patches I sent are also available on
http://cscience.org/~lucasvr/patches/vmnet-only-3.2.patch and
http://cscience.org/~lucasvr/patches/vmnet-only-4.0.patch .
Lucas
On Thursday 17 April 2003 15:12, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> On 17 Apr 03 at 13:48, Lucas Correia Villa Real wrote:
> > Is there a "correct" place at vmware.com to send these patches? I tryied
> > sending it to feature-request@vmware.com, but I got no response from
> > them.
> >
> > Anyway, below follows the patch providing support to devfs on the vmnet
> > driver for vmware workstation 4.0.
>
> You can send them to me if you do not trust feature-request...
>
> Proble with your patch is that it does not look like that it will
> build on 2.2.x without complaints, but I can fix that. More important
> question to me is: do people really use devfs?
>
> And if change will not make into next WS release, I can always distribute
> it from my site.
> Petr Vandrovec
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 22:00:24 EST