Re: gcc-2.95 broken on PPC?

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt (benh@kernel.crashing.org)
Date: Thu Apr 10 2003 - 09:20:55 EST


On Thu, 2003-04-10 at 14:56, mikpe@csd.uu.se wrote:

> However, bugs #1 (zlib.c) and #3 (div64.h) disappear if I compile
> my kernels with gcc-3.2.2 instead of 2.95.4, which is a strong
> indication that 2.95.4 is broken on PPC. Is this something that's
> well-known to PPC people?
>
> The patches are included below for reference.

It would be interesting to see the section dumps of the resulting
coff image and compare the version that works and the one that
doesn't. I still suspect some alignement crap, seeing this may
eventually show it.

Ben.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 15 2003 - 22:00:20 EST