On Tuesday 08 April 2003 00:25, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> The use of /proc is growing and you'll find that more than just
> fexecve() will fail if you don't have /proc.
Well, that was no news, but still; you know like... shouldn't it be
implemented? Or if I put it like this: If I were going to implemented, is
there any kind of chance to get that public, not least considering that it is
a new syscall and all?
Fredrik Tolf
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 07 2003 - 22:00:33 EST