Re: [PATCH] take 48-bit lba a bit further

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sun Apr 06 2003 - 09:35:25 EST


On Sul, 2003-04-06 at 14:32, John Bradford wrote:
> Then, don't we want to be using 48-bit lba all the time on compatible devices
> instead of falling back to 28-bit when possible to save a small amount of
> instruction overhead? (Or is that what we're doing already? I haven't really
> had the time to follow this thread).

The overhead of the double load of the command registers is microseconds so it
is actually quite a lot, especially since IDE lacks TCQ so neither end of the
link is doing *anything* useful. SCSI has similar problems on older SCSI with
command sending being slow, but the drive is at least doing other commands during
this.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 07 2003 - 22:00:28 EST