Re: ISA vs PCI interrupt handling

From: Krzysztof Halasa (khc@pm.waw.pl)
Date: Thu Apr 03 2003 - 14:17:07 EST

Next message: Stephan van Hienen: "Re: RAID 5 performance problems"
Previous message: Neil Schemenauer: "Re: RAID 5 performance problems"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: ISA vs PCI interrupt handling"
Next in thread: Jonathan Lundell: "Re: ISA vs PCI interrupt handling"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:

> For PCI at least you must mask the IRQ on your device in that situation.
> It must also be masked on the device not via disable_irq

Thanks.
Looks like it's even more important on ISA.

-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
Network Administrator
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Stephan van Hienen: "Re: RAID 5 performance problems"
Previous message: Neil Schemenauer: "Re: RAID 5 performance problems"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: ISA vs PCI interrupt handling"
Next in thread: Jonathan Lundell: "Re: ISA vs PCI interrupt handling"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 07 2003 - 22:00:20 EST