Re: 64GB NUMA-Q after pgcl

From: Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@suse.de)
Date: Mon Mar 31 2003 - 19:47:22 EST

Next message: Chad Talbott: "NFS core dump blocks"
Previous message: Keith Owens: "Re: [PATCH] Put all functions in kallsyms"
In reply to: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: 64GB NUMA-Q after pgcl"
Next in thread: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: 64GB NUMA-Q after pgcl"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 11:08:03AM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> I think the rmap allocations currently depend on CONFIG_MMU; IMHO it
> can be moved to CONFIG_SWAP if/when objrmap is merged since only

moving rmap under CONFIG_SWAP makes perfect sense to me. That could
payoff big on the big irons too, not just for embedded. Making it a
runtime option would be the best.

Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Chad Talbott: "NFS core dump blocks"
Previous message: Keith Owens: "Re: [PATCH] Put all functions in kallsyms"
In reply to: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: 64GB NUMA-Q after pgcl"
Next in thread: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: 64GB NUMA-Q after pgcl"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:00:38 EST