> > > > Shouldn't these be info->var.bits_per_pixel instead of fb_logo.depth?
> > >
> > > Yes, fb_logo.depth == info->var.bits_per_pixel.
> >
> > Euh, now I get confused... Do you mean
> > `Yes, it should be replaced by info->var.bits_per_pixel' or
> > `No, logo.depth is always equal to info->var.bits_per_pixel'?
>
> :) Sorry about that. I meant:
>
>
> `No, fb_logo.depth is always equal to info->var.bits_per_pixel'
No this is no longer true. For example last night I displayed the 16 color
logo perfectly fine on a 16 bpp display!!!! The mono display still has
bugs tho. The new logo tries to pick the best image to display. Say for
example we have two video cards. One running VESA fbdev at 16 bpp and a
another at vga 4 planar via vga16fb. This way we can have the both the 16
color and 224 color logo compiled in. The correct logo will be displayed
then on the correct display. Now say we only have a mono display but all
the cards support 8 bpp or better. That logo still gets displayed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 31 2003 - 22:00:31 EST