Re: smp overhead, and rwlocks considered harmful

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Sat Mar 22 2003 - 22:39:31 EST


On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 17:58, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I've always been a bit skeptical about rwlocks - if you're holding the lock
> for long enough for a significant amount of reader concurrency, you're
> holding it for too long. eg: tasklist_lock.

I totally agree with you Andrew, on modern SMP systems rwlocks
are basically worthless. I think we should kill them off and
convert all instances to spinlocks or some better primitive (perhaps
a more generalized big reader lock, Roman Zippel had something...)

-- 
David S. Miller <davem@redhat.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 23 2003 - 22:00:43 EST