Re: [2.5.65] Broken gcc test

From: Barry K. Nathan (barryn@pobox.com)
Date: Sat Mar 22 2003 - 18:23:43 EST


On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 07:30:54AM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> So the choice is to use the 3.x compiler which has issues as well as
> generating slow code, or to not be able to generate a decent error report
> if something doesn't work right, rip the half-assed check out, or just use
> 2.4 kernels.

There's another option: gcc 2.95.[34].

-Barry K. Nathan <barryn@pobox.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 23 2003 - 22:00:42 EST