On 22 Mar 2003, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 22:03, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > Previously callers called it with masked_irq=0 and disabling/enabling
> > hwif->irq code wasn't executed, now ide_do_request() is called with
> > masked_irq=IDE_NO_IRQ=-1 so this code is executed for sure.
>
> You are right - I botched the simplification of that. The logic is actually
> cleaner than I did with a bit more thought - IDE_NO_IRQ can go away and
> we should be using hwif->irq as the argument.
I think so.
-- Bartlomiej- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 23 2003 - 22:00:42 EST