Re: WimMark I report for 2.5.65-mm2

From: Andrew Morton (akpm@digeo.com)
Date: Thu Mar 20 2003 - 03:20:50 EST


Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> wrote:
>
> Besides, deadline is still the most solid choice.

Deadline will always be the best choice for OLTP workloads. Or CFQ - it
should perform the same.

All this workload does is seeks all over the disk doing teeny synchronous
I/O's. It is the worst-case for AS.

What we are trying to do at present is to make AS not _too_ bad for these
workloads so that people with mixed workloads or who are not familiar with
kernel arcanery don't accidentally end up with something which is
significantly slower than it should be.

It is an interesting test case.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 23 2003 - 22:00:30 EST