Re: WimMark I report for 2.5.65-mm2

From: Andrew Morton (akpm@digeo.com)
Date: Wed Mar 19 2003 - 20:57:26 EST

Next message: Matthew Grant: "Re: Ptrace patch for 2.4.x BREAKS kill() 2 interesting effects for .pid and dot locking? (was Re: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25)"
Previous message: Ed Vance: "RE: Linux-2.4.20 modem control"
In reply to: Joel Becker: "WimMark I report for 2.5.65-mm2"
Next in thread: Joel Becker: "Re: WimMark I report for 2.5.65-mm2"
Reply: Joel Becker: "Re: WimMark I report for 2.5.65-mm2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> WimMark I report for 2.5.65-mm2
>
> Runs: 1374.22 1487.19 1437.26
>

That is with elevator=as?

Is this a statistically significant difference from elevator=deadline?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Matthew Grant: "Re: Ptrace patch for 2.4.x BREAKS kill() 2 interesting effects for .pid and dot locking? (was Re: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25)"
Previous message: Ed Vance: "RE: Linux-2.4.20 modem control"
In reply to: Joel Becker: "WimMark I report for 2.5.65-mm2"
Next in thread: Joel Becker: "Re: WimMark I report for 2.5.65-mm2"
Reply: Joel Becker: "Re: WimMark I report for 2.5.65-mm2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 23 2003 - 22:00:29 EST