Re: [PATCH] fix nanosleep() granularity bumps

From: george anzinger (george@mvista.com)
Date: Tue Mar 18 2003 - 21:37:18 EST


Andrew Morton wrote:
> george anzinger <george@mvista.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>Here is a fix for the problem that eliminates the index from the
>>structure. The index ALWAYS depends on the current value of
>>base->timer_jiffies in a rather simple way which is I exploit. Either
>>patch works, but this seems much simpler...
>
>
> Seems to be a nice change. I think it would be better to get Tim's fix into
> Linus's tree and let your rationalisation bake for a while in -mm.
>
> There is currently a mysterious timer lockup happening on power4 machines.
> I'd like to keep these changes well-separated in time so we can get an
> understanding of what code changes correlate with changed behaviour.

Tell me more...
>
> There are timer changes in Linus's post-2.5.65 tree and your patch generates
> zillions of rejects against everything. Can you send me a diff against
> Linus's latest sometime?

Sure, possibly even tonight.

-g

>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

-- 
George Anzinger   george@mvista.com
High-res-timers:  http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Preemption patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 23 2003 - 22:00:25 EST