Am Dienstag, 18. März 2003 20:21 schrieb Linus Torvalds:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Brian Gerst wrote:
> > Here's a few more data points:
>
> Ok, this shows the behaviour I was trying to explain:
> > vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
> > cpu family : 5
> > model : 8
> > model name : AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor
> > stepping : 12
> > cpu MHz : 451.037
> > empty overhead=105 cycles
> > load overhead=-2 cycles
> > I$ load overhead=30 cycles
> > I$ load overhead=90 cycles
> > I$ store overhead=95 cycles
>
> ie loading from the same cacheline shows bad behaviour, most likely due to
> cache line exclusion. Does anybody have an original Pentium to see if I
> remember that one right?
Yes, you are right!
For an old Pentium-I with 133MHz (running FreeBSD, so I cannot provide
cpuinfo-data :-( ) I get following:
empty overhead=73 cycles
load overhead=0 cycles
I$ load overhead=88 cycles
I$ load overhead=96 cycles
I$ store overhead=72 cycles
And just to provide data for the AMD K6-III :
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 5
model : 9
model name : AMD-K6(tm) 3D+ Processor
stepping : 1
cpu MHz : 450.791
cache size : 256 KB
empty overhead=142 cycles
load overhead=89 cycles
I$ load overhead=95 cycles
I$ load overhead=99 cycles
I$ store overhead=91 cycles
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 23 2003 - 22:00:24 EST