re: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25

From: Tomas Szepe (szepe@pinerecords.com)
Date: Mon Mar 17 2003 - 13:20:40 EST

Next message: James Bourne: "re: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25"
Previous message: Manfred Spraul: "Re: [RFC] O(1) proc_pid_readdir"
In reply to: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25"
Next in thread: James Bourne: "re: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25"
Reply: James Bourne: "re: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25"
Reply: Alan Cox: "re: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25"
Reply: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> [arjanv@redhat.com]
>
> I've attached a patch against 2.4.21pre5.

So what happens now?

Is this critical enough for 2.4.21 to go out? Or can it wait like
some other fairly serious stuff such as the ext3 fixes? What about
the current state of IDE?

Would it make sense to repackage 2.4.20 into something like 2.4.20-p1
or 2.4.20.1 with only the critical stuff applied?

-- 
Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: James Bourne: "re: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25"
Previous message: Manfred Spraul: "Re: [RFC] O(1) proc_pid_readdir"
In reply to: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25"
Next in thread: James Bourne: "re: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25"
Reply: James Bourne: "re: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25"
Reply: Alan Cox: "re: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25"
Reply: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 23 2003 - 22:00:20 EST