In message <200303111707.09119.oliver@neukum.name> you write:
>
> > This means the module refcount must remain at 0, even after it's bound to
> > devices. Changing this would require a change in visible behavior, and
> > require an extra step by a user to disconnect the driver before they
> > unload the module.
>
> Yes, that would mean changing behaviour. On the other hand, we require
> new module utilities for 2.6 anyway, so why not?
Because I think it's silly, from a user point of view. Why are you
removing the module, after all?
Anyway, a pre-removal notifier in sys_module_delete would have the
same effect (with the same issues if the refcount isn't 0 after all,
and you then want to fail the rmmod).
Rusty.
-- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 23 2003 - 22:00:20 EST