I second that emotion. Let's not lose track, though, of how the
BitKeeper issue affects kernel development. Giving the BitKeeper
discussions their own home
achieves 2 things: keeps the kernel development list focused on kernel
development and gets the BitKeeper issues hashed out better by making
those its own separate forum.
Regards,
Josef
Christian Daudt wrote:
>This BitKeeper subject resurfaces every week or so and probably accounts for
>5-10% of the linux-kernel mailing list traffic. While a terribly interesting
>topic to some - it really isn't about the kernel. Could someone be so kind as
>to create a linux-kernel-bitkeeper (or linux-kernel-revision-control) mailing
>list so that these discussions (which obviously are not going away) can have
>a proper home?
>
> cheers,
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 23 2003 - 22:00:18 EST