Re: [patch] "HT scheduler", sched-2.5.63-B3

From: Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu)
Date: Fri Mar 07 2003 - 03:15:18 EST


On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Mike Galbraith wrote:

> I can (could with your earlier patches anyway) eliminate the X stalls by
> setting X junk to SCHED_FIFO. I don't have ram to plug in, but I'm as
> certain as I can be without actually doing so that it's not ram
> shortage.

okay. Can you eliminate the X stalls with setting X priority to -10 or so
(or SCHED_FIFO - although SCHED_FIFO is much more dangerous). And how does
interactivity under the same load look like with vanilla .64, as compared
to .64+combo? First step is to ensure that the new changes did not
actually hurt interactivity.

        Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 07 2003 - 22:00:36 EST