Re: [patch] "HT scheduler", sched-2.5.63-B3

From: Martin J. Bligh (mbligh@aracnet.com)
Date: Thu Mar 06 2003 - 17:14:07 EST


>> yes, an ELF flag might work, or my suggestion to allow applications to
>> increase their priority (up until a certain degree).
>
> An ELF flag might be better, as it's declarative -- it allows the kernel
> to implement 'interactivity' in various ways, so we can keep tweeking it.
> Priority might prove to be a bit different than interactivity, so we
> better not overload the two just yet.

Difficult to see how this would work. For instance, is bash interactive
or a batch job?

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 07 2003 - 22:00:34 EST