On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, ChristopherHuhn wrote:
> Newer means 2.4.21pre, since we are running 2.4.20?
> I assume that we will not upgrade the kernel before a new stable
> release, since it is - should be - a production environment.
>
> We have some indications, that our whole problem might be related to
> kernel NFS and mixing between 2.2.21 and 2.4.20 in both directions.
>
> I'll compile some more oopses and give you a report tomorrow.
Ok don't worry about upgrading kernels for now, (Disclaimer: I'm no NFS
expert). it looks like there might have been a race here.
Code: Bad EIP value
[rpc_call_sync+121/164]
[rpc_run_timer+0/240]
It looks like a possible race with rpc_execute and possibly the timer,
although i can't be certain where the other cpus are. Do the other oopses
look somewhat similar? Could you supply them?
Zwane
-- function.linuxpower.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 07 2003 - 22:00:27 EST