Re: anticipatory scheduling questions

From: Felipe Alfaro Solana (felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org)
Date: Sat Mar 01 2003 - 05:25:18 EST

----- Original Message -----
> > It wasn't a typo... In fact, both deadline and AS give roughly the same
> > timings (one second up or down). But I
> > still don't understand why 2.5 is performing so much worse than 2.4.
>
> Me either. It's a bug.
>
> Does basic 2.5.63 do the same thing? Do you have a feel for when it started
> happening?
 
This has happened since the moment I switched from 2.4 to 2.5.63-mm1.
 
> > Could a "vmstat" or "iostat" dump be interesting?
> 2.4 versus 2.5 would be interesting, yes.
 
I have retested this with 2.4.20-2.54, 2.5.63 and 2.5.63-mm1...
and have attached the files to this message (I think pasting them
here would result in wrapping, making it harder to read).
 
If you need more testing or benchmarking, ask for it :-)
 
Thanks!
  

-- 
______________________________________________
http://www.linuxmail.org/
Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr

Powered by Outblaze
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 07 2003 - 22:00:16 EST