Re: ioctl32 consolidation -- call for testing

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@suse.cz)
Date: Fri Feb 28 2003 - 08:20:11 EST

Next message: Suparna Bhattacharya: "Re: Software Suspend Functionality in 2.5"
Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: ioctl32 consolidation -- call for testing"
In reply to: Ben Collins: "Re: ioctl32 consolidation -- call for testing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi!

> > From: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
> > Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:27:39 -0500
> >
> > Here it is. Sparc64's macros for ioctl32's assumed that cmd was u_int
> > instead of u_long. This look ok to you, Dave?
> >
> > We would love to see that patch :-)
>
> It was real small...so small that it slipped through mutt's open() call
> and never got attached :)

Applied.

Pavel

-- 
Horseback riding is like software...
...vgf orggre jura vgf serr.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Suparna Bhattacharya: "Re: Software Suspend Functionality in 2.5"
Previous message: Pavel Machek: "Re: ioctl32 consolidation -- call for testing"
In reply to: Ben Collins: "Re: ioctl32 consolidation -- call for testing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 28 2003 - 22:00:48 EST