Re: VM problems in 2.4.20

From: Adam McKenna (adam@flounder.net)
Date: Wed Feb 26 2003 - 16:51:56 EST


On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 09:04:52PM +0100, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 February 2003 20:40, Adam McKenna wrote:
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> > I'm having a VM issue on one of my servers running 2.4.20.
> well, the vanilla VM, hmm, sorry: sucks :) for large boxen.

Can you expand on "sucks"? 4GB is not really that large of a system anymore.

I still don't see how this memory taken up by buffers/cache is not freed when
a system process needs it. I have always thought that this type of memory is
by definition "lower priority", and should be dropped when a process needs
more memory. Is this not the case?

--Adam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 28 2003 - 22:00:39 EST