On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 01:54:09AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Just one comment. You moved quite a few of the preempt_disable/enable
> > pairs outside of the CONFIG_SMP checks. The issue we're working against
> > here is to try and prevent preemption and ending up on a different CPU.
> > As this cannot happen if CONFIG_SMP=n, I don't see why you've done this.
> Just in two places.
Ok, slight exaggeration 8-) Looks good to me.
btw, (unrelated) shouldn't smp_call_function be doing magick checks
with cpu_online() ?
Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 28 2003 - 22:00:35 EST