Mark
I would to a quick snap with top, and when I saw 99.9% I assumed the the
process had
been there during the time top was starting up.
Looking at /proc/(pid)/cpu, shows that with two jobs running they are
sticking to cpu 0 and 1
which are siblings
Regards
Mike
Mark Hahn wrote:
>>that if I run two compute intensive jobs on a Dual Xeon, the processes
>>run on separate
>>physical cpus and can spend a significant amount of time with both on a
>>single
>>cpu.
>>
>>
>
>how did you determine this? running another program, such as top,
>will naturally disturb the scheduler and corrupt any observations.
>the only means I can think of is to look in /proc/<pid>/cpu near
>very infrequently (ideally, just before the processes exit.)
>or is this what you've done?
>
>
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Sullivan Director Performance Computing @lliance Technologies, Voice: (416) 385-3255, 18 Wynford Dr, Suite 407 Fax: (416) 385-1774 Toronto, ON, Canada, M3C-3S2 Toll Free:1-877-216-3199 http://www.alltec.com- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 28 2003 - 22:00:31 EST