On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 07:24:24PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> So whole stole the remaining 1.85 seconds? Looks like pte_highmem.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 06:17:27PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> would you mind to add the line for 2.4.21-pre4aa3? it has pte-highmem so
> you can easily find it out for sure if it is pte_highmem that stole >10%
> of your fast cpu. A line for the 2.4-rmap patch would be also
> interesting.
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 07:24:24PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> Note one second spent in pte_alloc_one().
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 06:17:27PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> note the seconds spent in the rmap affected paths too.
The pagetable cache is gone in 2.5, so pte_alloc_one() takes the
bitblitting hit for pagetables.
I didn't catch the whole profile, so I'll need numbers for rmap paths.
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 28 2003 - 22:00:29 EST