On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 12:25:23PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> You still complaining about not stashing the full path name of the
> module somewhere in the kernel?
>
> That would be because that was a HACK, and it's my job to say "no",
> even when that means we're not "feature complete" by someone's
> definition.
You've yet to explain why it's a hack as opposed to a reasonable level
of discoverability. This includes your comments on IRC where you agreed
I had a point.
> You seem to have taken the politeness of my previous response as an
> indication of uncertainty.
I took your point and agreed to translate into whatever you like. I'm
not a kernel hacker and I don't particularly give a shit ...
regards,
john
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 28 2003 - 22:00:25 EST