On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:35:24PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> writes:
>
> |> Does gcc still warn about things like
> |>
> |> #define COUNT (sizeof(array)/sizeof(element))
> |>
> |> int i;
> |> for (i = 0; i < COUNT; i++)
> |> ...
> |>
> |> where COUNT is obviously unsigned (because sizeof is size_t and thus
> |> unsigned)?
> |>
> |> Gcc used to complain about things like that, which is a FUCKING DISASTER.
>
> How can you distinguish that from other occurrences of (int)<(size_t)?
The bounds are obviously constant and unsigned at compile time.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 28 2003 - 22:00:22 EST