Re: [PATCH] comments on st_blksize and f_bsize for 2.5

From: Andries Brouwer (aebr@win.tue.nl)
Date: Mon Feb 24 2003 - 05:20:09 EST


On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 08:25:40PM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote:

> Since a few applications, and the linux manpages, seem to not really
> understand what these are for, they need comments like SUSv2 has for
> them. A larger discussion will be provided if requested.

> + unsigned int st_blksize; /* Optimal I/O size */

> + int f_bsize; /* Filesystem blocksize */

Yes, discussion - I wouldnt mind seeing details.

The trivial part is st_blksize: all agree.
Quoting the man page:

       The value st_blksize gives the "preferred" blocksize
       for efficient file system I/O. (Writing to a file in
       smaller chunks may cause an inefficient read-modify-rewrite.)

The nontrivial part is f_bsize. As far as I can see
BSD and SYSV and SUS all differ. And there are the use
in struct statfs and the use in struct statvfs that are
nonequivalent.

Maybe BSD f_iosize, f_bsize in statfs corresponds to
SYSV f_bsize, f_frsize in statfs. Linux is again a
bit different.

Andries
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 28 2003 - 22:00:18 EST