Re: Question about Linux signal handling

From: Jesse Pollard (jesse@cats-chateau.net)
Date: Sun Feb 23 2003 - 11:30:07 EST


On Saturday 22 February 2003 22:45, Tom Sanders wrote:
> If I catch a signal (SIGUSR2) using "sigaction" call
> then is the signal handler replaced with default
> handling, if I don't install the signal handler again?
>
> I remember that in UNIX "signal" system call default
> signal bahavior was to replace the signal handler with
> default after everytime signal was received?
>
> My observation is that even if I get same signal
> twice, I get the same print (which I have in my signal
> handler) again, illustrating that signal handler was
> not replaced with default !!! Is that the correct
> behavior of "sigaction"?

Depends on the value of sa_flags parameter:

>From the manpage SIGACTION(2):

       sa_flags specifies a set of flags which modify the
       behaviour of the signal handling process. It is formed by
       the bitwise OR of zero or more of the following:
 
              SA_NOCLDSTOP
                     If signum is SIGCHLD, do not receive notifi-
                     cation when child processes stop (i.e., when
                     child processes receive one of SIGSTOP,
                     SIGTSTP, SIGTTIN or SIGTTOU).
 
              SA_ONESHOT or SA_RESETHAND
                     Restore the signal action to the default
                     state once the signal handler has been
                     called. (This is the default behavior of
                     the signal(2) system call.)
 
              SA_RESTART
                     Provide behaviour compatible with BSD signal
                     semantics by making certain system calls
                     restartable across signals.
 
              SA_NOMASK or SA_NODEFER
                     Do not prevent the signal from being
                     received from within its own signal handler.
 
              SA_SIGINFO
                     The signal handler takes 3 arguments, not
                     one. In this case, sa_sigaction should be
                     set instead of sa_handler. (The sa_sigac-
                     tion field was added in Linux 2.1.86.)

You are describing SA_ONESHOT as what you think you should
get..

I believe you are getting the correct result. With the ONESHOT option
you can/will loose signals, since the handler would be set back to the
default, and any subsequent signal lost. This loss of signals is one of the
original complaints about UNIX signal handling.

Now my manpage continues with the warning:

       The POSIX spec only defines SA_NOCLDSTOP. Use of other
       sa_flags is non-portable.

and:

CONFORMING TO
       POSIX, SVr4. SVr4 does not document the EINTR condition.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:39 EST