Re: 2.4.20-ac1, tulip driver falls into transmit timeouts

From: Marc Haber (mh+linux-kernel@zugschlus.de)
Date: Sat Feb 22 2003 - 06:24:24 EST


On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 09:53:31AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> I suspect that your Catalyst has its interface in auto-negociation mode. This
> switch behaves randomly when in auto-neg. I had some which spontaneously
> renegociated after several months in production. You should force the ports
> to 100FD on the switch to make the problem disappear. BTW, when forced, it
> doesn't send its capabilities on the link and NICs often think it's a hub and
> then switch to 100 half. So you may also have to force your NICs to 100 fdx
> (ethtool or mii-diag).

yuck. Will try that later today.

> BTW, ensure that there's no spanning tree on the switch since it may be an
> external indirect cause of the link drops that your PC detected. BTW, note that
> exactly one minute has elapsed between your half and full duplex state changes.
> This might help in finding the origin of the problem.

The port is "spanning-tree portfast", but we need spanning tree on the
switch because of some reundant links being present in the network.

> Hoping this helps,

Thanks for your comments.

Greetings
Marc

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber         | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Karlsruhe, Germany |  lose things."    Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 721 966 32 15
Nordisch by Nature |  How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 721 966 31 29
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:36 EST