Hello,
> I'm not saying it should, but it would be good from a PR
> perspective and as
> an element in the reliability feeling vector ;-)
Not sure about it... People like it when a product looks stable,
and having a -blah or -pre and so on once a week doesn't make
me feel I have some stable product...
> The number of -pre releases shouldn't be limited for its own sake, but
> rather in the process of stabilising the kernel for release.
> So I mean after
> a couple of -pre releases start focussing on debugging and
> then finish with
> a few -rc's before the next cycle starts. That way the diffs
> between full
> versions are smaller and upgrading gets easier.
So, the question is to choose between :
- less releases with more changes
or
- more relaseases with less changes
Is that correct ?
Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:29 EST