Thanks for the commants.
-----Original Message-----
From: Christoph Hellwig
To: Osamu Tomita
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List; Alan Cox
Sent: 2003/02/18 19:45
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.61 (5/26) char
device
>> + __const_udelay(lp.wait * 4);
>
> Why do you use __const_udelay instead of udelay?
I need nano-sec. delay for device timing.
I cleaned up lp_old98.c as your advices and sent incremental patch
to Alan. I'll post whole patch for next version.
Thanks,
Osamu Tomita
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:27 EST