Re: [PATCH] add new DMA_ADDR_T_SIZE define

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Wed Feb 19 2003 - 17:38:41 EST

Next message: Tom Lendacky: "Re: [PATCH] IPSec protocol application order"
Previous message: Ion Badulescu: "Re: [PATCH] add new DMA_ADDR_T_SIZE define"
In reply to: Ion Badulescu: "Re: [PATCH] add new DMA_ADDR_T_SIZE define"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] add new DMA_ADDR_T_SIZE define"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

   From: Ion Badulescu <ionut@badula.org>
   Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:53:02 -0500 (EST)

   So is the current wisdom something like "always treat dma_addr_t as a u64
   and be happy"?

Yes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Tom Lendacky: "Re: [PATCH] IPSec protocol application order"
Previous message: Ion Badulescu: "Re: [PATCH] add new DMA_ADDR_T_SIZE define"
In reply to: Ion Badulescu: "Re: [PATCH] add new DMA_ADDR_T_SIZE define"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] add new DMA_ADDR_T_SIZE define"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:27 EST