Re: [PATCH] IPSec protocol application order

From: $B5HF#1QL@(
Date: Wed Feb 19 2003 - 17:07:48 EST

Next message: shesha bhushan: "how to convert iovecs to page?"
Previous message: Ion Badulescu: "Re: [PATCH] add new DMA_ADDR_T_SIZE define"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] IPSec protocol application order"
Next in thread: Tom Lendacky: "Re: [PATCH] IPSec protocol application order"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In article <20030219.133906.127189630.davem@redhat.com> (at Wed, 19 Feb 2003 13:39:06 -0800 (PST)), "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> says:

> setkey is for manual keying and debugging. Therefore, disallowing
> experimenting with non-rfc-compliant orderings seems to lack purpose
> to me.

I'm for davem. Setkey is very flexible manual-keying tool and
we should not limit this flexibility.

--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: shesha bhushan: "how to convert iovecs to page?"
Previous message: Ion Badulescu: "Re: [PATCH] add new DMA_ADDR_T_SIZE define"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] IPSec protocol application order"
Next in thread: Tom Lendacky: "Re: [PATCH] IPSec protocol application order"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:27 EST