On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 09:09:35PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 11:39:07AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > usr/lib/arch/arm/MCONFIG | 26
> Any good reasons for such a screaming name?
> makefile.config eventually.
Ask Peter :)
> > usr/lib/arch/arm/Makefile.inc | 31
>
> No extension is used for arch/arm/Makefile
> Why does klibc differ in this respect?
> [An answer that tell me that arch/arm/Makefile should
> change is fine with me..]
Ask Russell :)
> > usr/lib/makeerrlist.pl | 80
> > usr/lib/socketcalls.pl | 75
>
> This mixture of code and scripts to generate code hursts my eye.
> What about usr/scripts/.
But they are the scripts used to build the code in usr/lib. I don't
care where they go, that's just where they were in the klibc tarball.
> I assume you do not want them in scripts/
Yeah, I wouldn't think they should go their either.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:26 EST