Re: [PATCH][2.5] flush_tlb_all is not preempt safe.

From: Thomas Schlichter (schlicht@uni-mannheim.de)
Date: Wed Feb 19 2003 - 15:23:50 EST

Next message: Roman Zippel: "Re: [PATCH/RFC] New module refcounting for net_proto_family"
Previous message: Erik Tews: "Re: statistics of usage of this mailinglist"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

I've created a patch based on yours to solve the flush_tlb_all preempt-issue
for x86_64 and the i386/mach-voyager subarchitecture. I'm not sure if the
ia64 architecture would need to be patched, too...?

Wouldn't it even have been possible to solve this problem just by swapping the
two original lines?

Best regards
Thomas Schlichter

text/x-diff attachment: flush_tlb_all_preempt.patch

application/pgp-signature attachment: signature

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Roman Zippel: "Re: [PATCH/RFC] New module refcounting for net_proto_family"
Previous message: Erik Tews: "Re: statistics of usage of this mailinglist"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:26 EST