Hi. Thanks for the comment.
-----Original Message-----
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
To: bgerst@didntduck.org
Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com; tomita@cinet.co.jp; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk; hch@infradead.org
Sent: 2003/02/18 4:02
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.61 (16/26) NIC
In article <3E5124AC.80505@didntduck.org> (at Mon, 17 Feb 2003 13:06:36
-0500), Brian Gerst <bgerst@didntduck.org> says:
>> > > -#ifdef __ISAPNP__
>> > > +#if defined(__ISAPNP__) && !defined(CONFIG_X86_PC9800)
> :
>> > Perhaps a dumb question, but I wonder if the above ifdef can be
>> > simplified by turning off ISAPNP on PC9800?
>>
>> As long as the machine has ISA expansion slots, ISAPNP is possible.
It
>> is a property of the card, not the system.
>
> Some C-bus (this is the name of the bus of the PC-9800 expansion slots)
> cards seems PnP-capable while PC-9800 series have no ISA slots as I
> remember.
> I don't know if Linux ISAPNP suport work well with them.
C-Bus PNP feature is compatible with ISA PNP except for control port
address.
By changing them from 0x259/0x279 to 0xa59/0xa79, PNP works fine.
Thanks,
Osamu Tomita
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:20 EST