In message <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302141334560.1336-100000@serv> you write:
> Rusty, I'm asking all these questions on purpose, I want to help you to
> understand the complete problem and how limited your solutions are. So
> either please answer my questions or point out the mistakes in my
> argumentation.
There were two major changes in the module code. The first was to
simplify the userland interface, from:
sys_create_module(name, size)
sys_query_module(...) (a 5-way multiplexed syscall)
sys_init_module(name, ptr)
to:
sys_init_module(ptr, len, userargs)
To argue against this change is a demonstration of lack of
understanding, or a complete lack of taste.
The second change was the speed up one system of module locking in the
kernel which wasn't racy, and deprecate the other system which was
racy in 99% of its uses. That is all.
Did it solve all the races in the kernel? Of course not. But it's
simple to use, already well understood in the kernel, and avoids
massive changes. It also allows connection tracking to be properly
modularized, which was my long-lost original purpose.
I've repeated this enough now, I think.
Rusty.
-- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:16 EST