On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 08:51 pm, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16 2003, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > Here are contest (http://contest.kolivas.org) results with osdl
> > (http://www.osdl.org) hardware for 2.5.61-mm1 with either the as i/o
> > scheduler or the cfq scheduler.
> >
> > io_load:
> > Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> > 2.5.60-mm1 3 112 67.0 15.7 7.1 1.42
> > 2.5.61 2 143 52.4 32.9 13.3 1.81
> > 2.5.61-mm1 2 634 12.5 257.3 24.6 7.83
> > 2.5.61-mm1cfq 3 397 19.6 123.3 18.1 5.03
>
> These loo fishy, could be some other interaction. I'm consistently
> beating 2.5.60-mm1/2.5.61 on io_load here, but that is 2.5.61 base and
> not 2.5.61-mm1 base. Could be something odd happening there.
I dont think they're fishy - taken in the mm1 context -. I have tested cfq3a
without mm1 and it does beat the baseline. See a previous email I posted with
it.
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 22:00:14 EST