Re: [PATCH] Restore module support.

From: Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Date: Fri Feb 07 2003 - 14:50:58 EST


On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:43:19AM -0800, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > (2) has the disadvantage that its touching non-architecture specific
> > code, but this is the option I'd prefer due to the obvious performance
> > advantage. However, I'm afraid that it isn't worth the effort to fix
> > up vmalloc and /proc/kcore. vmalloc fix appears simple, but /proc/kcore
> > has issues (anyone know what KCORE_BASE is all about?)
>
> KCORE_BASE is my fault ... it was an attempt to fix the "modules
> below PAGE_OFFSET" problem for the ia64 port. For a few nanoseconds
> the code just here looked like this:
>
> #if VMALLOC_START < PAGE_OFFSET
> #define KCORE_BASE VMALLOC_START
> #else
> #define KCORE_BASE PAGE_OFFSET
> #endif

Ah, ok. What I'm thinking of is something like the following (untested
and probably improperly thought out patch...):

--- orig/fs/proc/kcore.c Sat Nov 2 18:58:18 2002
+++ linux/fs/proc/kcore.c Fri Feb 7 19:48:35 2003
@@ -99,7 +99,10 @@
 }
 #else /* CONFIG_KCORE_AOUT */
 
+#ifndef KCORE_BASE
 #define KCORE_BASE PAGE_OFFSET
+#define in_vmlist_region(x) ((x) >= VMALLOC_START && (x) < VMALLOC_END)
+#endif
 
 #define roundup(x, y) ((((x)+((y)-1))/(y))*(y))
 
@@ -394,7 +397,7 @@
                 tsz = buflen;
                 
         while (buflen) {
- if ((start >= VMALLOC_START) && (start < VMALLOC_END)) {
+ if (in_vmlist_region(start)) {
                         char * elf_buf;
                         struct vm_struct *m;
                         unsigned long curstart = start;

An architecture could then define KCORE_BASE and in_vmlist_region()
alongside their VMALLOC_START definition if they needed to change
them.

> There was some discussion on a better way to do this, by adding the
> kernel itself to the vmlist, and eliminating all the special case code.
> I took a brief look at this, but realised that there were all sorts
> of ugly race conditions with /proc/kcore if a module is loaded/unloaded
> after some process has read the Elf header.

Well, only root can debug using /proc/kcore, and I'd suggest the best
answer to that problem is "if it hurts, don't do that." I don't think
you should prevent modules from being unloaded just because you have
/proc/kcore open.

-- 
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 07 2003 - 22:00:24 EST