<niteowl@intrinsity.com> wrote:
>
> FWIW, here's a list of potential 2.5.59 kernel bugs. Some of these
> might be causing real trouble. Many are probably benign. A few may be
> non-bugs that are just poor coding style although I've tried to weed
I assume you picked these up with `gcc -W'?
gcc -W generates ten megabytes of warnings, with a few gems. We really need
finer-grained control of gcc warnings so that the good ones can be turned on.
gcc warnings are being redone at present and this might yet happen...
> fs/super.c:313 if (!sb->s_op->sync_fs);
That's fixed in 2.5.59++
> net/ipv4/fib_hash.c:944 if (iter->zone->fz_next);
That too. davem said "OMG that's scary :)"
> fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:235 if (!super_block | (super_block->s_flags & MS_ACTIVE)) {
I'll fix that up.
As for the rest well gee. Perhaps we should stick #error's in there to
flush out some people who can test the fixes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 07 2003 - 22:00:21 EST