[it would be really nice if you at least Cc'ed me when replying to my mails..
*sigh*]
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 05:16:39PM +0000, David Wagner wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >Well, selinux is still far from a mergeable shape and even needed additional
> >patches to the LSM tree last time I checked. This think of submitting hooks
> >for code that obviously isn't even intende to be merged in mainline is what
> >I really dislike, and it's the root for many problems with LSM.
>
> You keep bringing up SELinux. Maybe you dislike SELinux; I don't know.
> In any case, LSM is not there just to support SELinux. It's intended
> to support a broad range of security modules and security policies.
> LSM is bigger than just SELinux.
I bring up selinux because it's the only module in the lsm patches that I
consider more than just a bunch of hacks. So, no it's not a dislike but
they only thing I actually consider worth mentioning.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 07 2003 - 22:00:20 EST