Re: 2.5 changeset 1.952.4.2 corrupt in fs/jfs/inode.c

From: Larry McVoy (lm@bitmover.com)
Date: Wed Feb 05 2003 - 18:29:22 EST

Next message: Larry McVoy: "Re: 2.5 changeset 1.952.4.2 corrupt in fs/jfs/inode.c"
Previous message: Samuel Flory: "Re: 2.4.21pre4aa1"
In reply to: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: 2.5 changeset 1.952.4.2 corrupt in fs/jfs/inode.c"
Next in thread: Matt Reppert: "Re: 2.5 changeset 1.952.4.2 corrupt in fs/jfs/inode.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> it might be simply an error in the tarball, maybe Linus's tree isn't in
> full sync with bk head. But something definitely is corrupt between
> tarball and bk.

That is an incorrect statement. You are comparing a moving target with
a snapshot. If you roll the moving target back to the snapshot point
you get the tarball contents.

-- 
---
Larry McVoy            	 lm at bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Larry McVoy: "Re: 2.5 changeset 1.952.4.2 corrupt in fs/jfs/inode.c"
Previous message: Samuel Flory: "Re: 2.4.21pre4aa1"
In reply to: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: 2.5 changeset 1.952.4.2 corrupt in fs/jfs/inode.c"
Next in thread: Matt Reppert: "Re: 2.5 changeset 1.952.4.2 corrupt in fs/jfs/inode.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 07 2003 - 22:00:19 EST